A rare and strict action has taken place in the judicial system. The Principal Secretary of the Law Department, Prathibha Devi, issued official orders for the permanent removal of Dharmavaram Senior Civil Judge B. Krishnaveni from service. This severe action against a judicial officer has become a major topic of discussion among legal circles and the public in the state.
Severe Allegations Leading to Removal
The primary reasons for Judge B. Krishnaveni's removal from service stem from the severe allegations against her, which were proven during the inquiry. These issues were not mere procedural errors but amounted to a serious violation of the sanctity and responsibilities of the judicial office:
Negligence in Writing Judgments and Issuing Orders: Judge Krishnaveni showed extreme negligence in writing judgments within the stipulated period even after the conclusion of case hearings. Furthermore, the failure to sign court orders (Orders) in time led to the paralysis of the judicial process, forcing litigants to wait for justice for prolonged periods.
Delegation of Judicial Functions to Staff (Most Serious Allegation): This was the most serious charge. It was proven that she delegated crucial and strictly judicial tasks, such as writing judgments and issuing formal judicial orders (Judicial Functions), to court staff (e.g., typists, clerks) instead of performing them herself. This act is considered misuse of office and breach of trust within the judicial system, undermining its integrity.
Crucial Decision by the High Court "Full Court"
Given the seriousness of the allegations against Judge Krishnaveni, the Andhra Pradesh High Court conducted a detailed inquiry into the matter.
* Inquiry and Recommendation: After the allegations were confirmed, the Full Court (a meeting comprising all the sitting judges of the High Court) convened. Recognizing the grave violation of the judicial code of conduct and responsibilities, the Full Court strongly recommended to the State Government that she be permanently removed from service.
Government Action: Based on the recommendation of the High Court, the Principal Secretary of the Law Department, Prathibha Devi, immediately issued the removal orders.
⚖️ A Symbol of Accountability
This strict action taken against a high-ranking official in the judiciary reflects several key principles:
Strict Accountability: The decision clearly affirms that there is strict accountability for lapses, negligence, or misuse of office by judicial officers.
System Integrity: This incident proves that the High Court maintains a firm stance on protecting the transparency and integrity of the judicial process.
Message: This action serves as a strong message to other judicial officers that failure to perform duties with integrity and according to rules will lead to severe consequences.
This entire affair has once again brought the internal discipline and governance aspects of the judicial system into the public spotlight.
Would you like to know the difference between a Senior Civil Judge and a District Judge in the Indian Judicial System?
0 Comments